DWP demand access at random to your home and documents http://t.co/0HVjFGZTBu via @samedifference1
— Rebecca Devitt (@CarbonisedPleb) June 18, 2014
@MidWalesMike Legal Advice to claimants: #DWP RANDOM HOME SPOT CHECKS ~ COOPERATION NOT COMPULSORY RT & FB http://t.co/r71NT5Bl5b
— Black Triangle (@blacktriangle1) June 18, 2014
The DWP and Jobcentre are treating benefit claimants worse than criminals.
— Samuel Miller (@Hephaestus7) June 17, 2014
DWP DEMAND ACCESS TO YOUR HOME & DOCUMENTS | glynismillward189 http://t.co/espl82QALa
— Samuel Miller (@Hephaestus7) June 18, 2014
DWP demand access at random to your home and documents https://t.co/a0EFFKJAlb <<1930s poor laws complete
— Sue Marsh (@suey2y) June 18, 2014
Article, also
included in this blog item on Austerity, but it is relevant to this also as the different cost of living burdens due
to proportion of expenditure on essentials the poor have can mean an economy
can have very high expenditure inflation for poorer people, that may have much
less impact or even be counterbalanced by savings for richer people, based on
essential spending and how much they spend on luxuries. When it's all essential
spending there is little or no room for manoeuvre and nothing can be cut back,
adding to the pressure and leading to debt and associated health effects. The
following article illustrates how different forms of taxation and expenditure
as a proportion of income and disposable income vary according to wealth for
the poor "Welfare Myth Three -
The Poor Don't Pay Taxes":
Part of the problem that people who have to claim and worse having no choice but to rely on inadequate benefits, is having to cope and deal with growing harassment directly dished out by MPs and media, and parroted by ignorant and easily manipulated public.
If a society fails to provide for or at least acknowledge
that there is an insufficient number of living wage jobs for everyone, or to accommodate
the needs for those who are not taken on by employers for many reasons, often discriminatory,
it is deluded. Worse still to label, stereotype and harass the poor is on the threshold of instigating hate towards victims in a
disturbing mirroring of previous societies corrupted by evil leaders where people
have been targeted for exclusion, poverty and even worse, the darkest places in
human history.
Scapegoating of the poor and disabled is a dangerous game, a
failure of a society.
For any government backed by mainstream media to systematically
target the victims of a failed economy or to instigate a two tier economy of ‘haves’
and ‘have-nots’, inequality division based on deliberate inequality, break the UN Human Rights and Geneva Convention articles.
Sanctioning of poor people on benefits, i.e. stopping benefits, usually for very spurious and insufficient reasons. It is an abhorrent and inhumane, it is a means to
impoverish even more and counter-productive in terms of job seeking as not enough
money restrict ability to go after what work there may be, bearing in mind
limitations of combinations of income and location costs. The cost of living
itself. For those with no relatives or family they can turn to sanctions mean literally
no means to survive apart from begging or turning to crime, but ironically the
most decent of the poor are not criminals so tends not to be the course of action
they pursue, instead starving or becoming malnourished. As well as physical
there are psychological consequences for poverty and harassment that is part of
the benefit system and the constant anti-benefit rhetoric of ‘scroungers ‘and
the likes in the media. Yet the big cheats, MPs, bankers, corporate executives,
are given a free ride, with no condemnation, if anything a hero-workshop of
their wealth and ill-gotten gains from the exploitation of others.
Another punishment, community service has been for decades a
punishment for criminals but now is threatened as a punishment for being unemployed
or unable to gain a level of income that means they don’t need benefits, or rather
certain types of benefits, as benefits that are universal, such as child benefit
when received by richer people as legitimate, but the same and other benefits
when received by poorer people as illegitimate, as unworthy of support to live
in UK.
Workfare is an intended more innocuous sounding name that is used in place of slave labour, which it is as it is labour for no income or for benefits that are inadequate. They are not a living wage and they break minimum wage levels by a very long way, especially inadequate and impoverishing as UK has one of the highest cost of living in the world. Income from employment should cover at least the essentials of life, home, shelter, warmth and food and all unavoidable utility bills and costs of just living. Work should also provide a surplus income to enable people to do things they enjoy and insufficient income is a failure of an economic and social system that can divide society between adequately, well and very well paid and poorly and very inadequately paid.
For corporations and companies a pool of unpaid labour, many even given government money, often £1000s as a tip, to use staff, yet to companies with massive profits, this is a great disincentive to employ paid staff and also serves to push down on wage rates of paid staff, thus forcing down the lowest paid sector of the UK, whist at the top pay scales are rocketing to all-time highs.
Workfare is an intended more innocuous sounding name that is used in place of slave labour, which it is as it is labour for no income or for benefits that are inadequate. They are not a living wage and they break minimum wage levels by a very long way, especially inadequate and impoverishing as UK has one of the highest cost of living in the world. Income from employment should cover at least the essentials of life, home, shelter, warmth and food and all unavoidable utility bills and costs of just living. Work should also provide a surplus income to enable people to do things they enjoy and insufficient income is a failure of an economic and social system that can divide society between adequately, well and very well paid and poorly and very inadequately paid.
For corporations and companies a pool of unpaid labour, many even given government money, often £1000s as a tip, to use staff, yet to companies with massive profits, this is a great disincentive to employ paid staff and also serves to push down on wage rates of paid staff, thus forcing down the lowest paid sector of the UK, whist at the top pay scales are rocketing to all-time highs.
Now there is even being mention a threat to anyone on benefits of a state representative calling round and knocking on
people's doors, to instil fear on disabled and poor. It is not for evidence based suspected law breaking, a search warrant. It is not for even suspected benefit fraud,
of which studies have shown to in reality be very rare, in spite of public opinion
whipped up by a government and media frenzy, but for anyone on benefits. It is therefore a means, to pry
on, to harass, with stress consequences, which for many adds to the stresses they are having to already cope with and for some can push them over the edge. It
is a further step infringing on and breaking human rights.
We are expected to spend a 7 figure sum doing up Kensington Palace but deny a poor person a spare bedroom. Twisted and evil me thinks.
— bill (@kingbill73) June 21, 2014
When approached regarding the suffering of the poor in UK, Iain Duncan Smith and Esther McVey ran away from TV journalist Sonia Poulton:
Yes, Iain Duncan Smith is vile, that's why we were forced to chase him and @EstherMcVeyMP https://t.co/3XmJULMKEX #newswithoutfilters
— Sonia Poulton (@SoniaPoulton) May 29, 2014
Ongoing blog item
that can be added to and updated as appropriateAn example of what has become typical repeated 'scrounger' rhetoric from the mainstream media, especially tabloid press, popular television and government since 2010:
@chunkymark @RaggyTroosers @ALICAT9128 @stpdh - Tories reward "Benefit Scroungers" look at the Royals, Bankers, pic.twitter.com/slwt7hp2kq
— AwakenUnite (@AwakenUnite) June 23, 2014
Article featuring tweet from Conservative party via 'Conservatives
North' labelling people on benefits as 'scroungers', "Conservatives
under fire after labelling people out of work as 'benefit scroungers":http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/conservatives-under-fire-after-labelling-7305282
No comments:
Post a Comment